Apparently TurboTax and other Intuit products, such as Lacerte, Intuit online & ProSeries, have been having so many issues with Minnesota state returns that the Minnesota Dept. of Revenue issued a statement erging taxpayers not to file their state returns using any of Intuits products.

Some of the issues include things such as assigning political contributions to the wrong party, mishaps with education credits for multiple dependents, incorrectly calculating property tax refunds, and other calculation errors.

If you haven’t already prepared your return with any of Intuit’s products, the DoR suggests using another software to prepare your return or waiting until the problems have been fixed. If you’ve already filed, contact Intuit at 1-866-888-4609.

For more, read the MN Dept. of Revenue Statement here.

{ 0 comments }

And So It Goes

Almost 2 years ago, I wrote a post emphatically stating that I was back (to paying attention to this blog, that is), then I promptly went away again. But for good reason: I’ve been extremely busy.

Actually, that’s a lie, but only partly.

With only so many hours in a day, and so many things to get done, I just simply didn’t have the time. I was drowning in information and other things that I felt absolutely needed to get done, while neglecting the things that were, well, actually important.

Lots have changed since I wrote that post—both personally and professionally. The only thing that hasn’t changed is my love for taxation.

Although I’ve already said this once before, I actually mean it this time: I’m back.

{ 0 comments }

2012 Filing Deadline Extended

The IRS recently announced that, like last year, the 2012 deadline has been extended to April 17, 2012. I’d like to say it was because they just felt like being nice, but I’d be lying. They extended the deadline because April 15 happens to be a Sunday, and Washington DC observes Emancipation Day the very next day, on April 16.

If you plan on filing an extension, be careful. The due date for extended returns will be October 15, not 17.

While we’re at it, here’s another date for you: January 17. That’s the first day you can e-file your returns.

Now, at the risk of sounding like mother hen, there’s no reason you have to wait until any of these dates to actually prepare your return. And by all means, don’t wait until April 17 to call your tax accountant for an extension. It drives them crazy. Trust me on this.

{ 0 comments }

You’ve heard of S Corporations. Your neighbor’s company is organized as an S corporation. And you’ve heard him go on an on about how awesome S corporations are. You’ve heard just about everyone (and their mother) tout S corporations as being the perfect entity. And they are—in certain situations.

You see, choosing an entity takes care and consideration and no entity qualifies as one-size-fits-all. So while an S corporation may be awesome for your neighbor (and his mom), the same may not be true for you.

When is organizing your company as an S corporation ideal? And just what makes them so awesome?

For starters, S corporations, unlike regular corporations, aren’t subject to double taxation. Regular corporations pay tax on income, and then you, as a shareholder, pay tax on the profits distributed to you (known as dividends). S corporations don’t pay income tax (though they may be subject to other taxes). The income is simply “passed through” to each individual shareholder, who then reports his share of income on his personal income tax return. The corporation can then distribute profits to each shareholder tax free (so long as there’s sufficient basis). Therefore, any amount distributed by the corporation to each shareholder is only subject to tax once.

This pass through nature of the S corporation is one of the reasons the entity can be ideal in some tax planning situations.

Here’s one situation where an S corporation may be ideal:

For some companies, particularly in the early years, the company may be operating at a loss. Each individual shareholder gets their share of this loss (assuming there is enough basis), which can then be deducted on their personal income tax return. This can be used to offset income that otherwise would’ve been taxable. And since S corporation owner-shareholders are supposed to pay themselves a reasonable salary, this loss can even be used to offset the wages paid to you by your company. Awesome, indeed.

There’s more… S corporations are eligible for Section 1244 treatment. So, let’s say this startup of yours is unsuccessful and the stock is later disposed of at a loss. This loss is allowed to be categorized as an ordinary loss, instead of what normally happens: treating the loss as a capital. Categorizing it as a capital loss means you can only net it against other capital gain or be limited to a $3,000 annual deduction. Being allowed to categorize the loss as ordinary means that the entire amount can be deducted at once.

Here’s another:

Quite the opposite of the above scenario, your company is very successful and actually has quite a bit of cash on hand. Your company’s future is looking pretty good. With a regular corporation, if you were going to distribute some of this wealth to shareholders, it would be ideal to be able to classify this as salary and not as dividends. Why? Because salaries, unlike dividends, are deductible to the corporation and they are taxable as ordinary income to the shareholder. The IRS, being the IRS and all, is obviously aware of this and is notorious for reclassifying unreasonably high compensation as dividends.

However, with S corporations, this isn’t necessarily an issue. And organizing as such minimizes any issues you’d have with unreasonable compensation. You either pay this as a salary (deductible by the corporation) or as distributions (not deductible by the corporation, but not taxable to the individual shareholder either).

The above situation is especially ideal when the corporation is a personal service corporation (PSC). PSCs are those companies that:

  1. At least 95% of the the time spent by the company’s employees is devoted to services in either the health (including veterinary), law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, or consulting, and
  2. At least 95% of the stock is held directly (or indirectly) by either the employees performing these services or retired employees who did perform these services or their estates, or any other person that in the two-year period starting with the date that such an employee died, acquired that individual’s stock because of his death.

That was a mouthful.

So, if my company was organized as a regular corporation, I’d be considered a PSC. So would my family physician, my dog’s vet, the architect that designed the building I live in, that ballet company… you get the idea.

This is important because PSCs are subject to a flat tax of 35%. That’s right, no graduated rates for PSCs. It would therefore be beneficial for the company to be organized as an S Corporation. Not only does the S Corporation get rid of that dreadful flat tax of 35%, it is free to distribute enough of the accumulated cash to each shareholder to pay the tax they’d be subject to (remember: income of the S corp. is passed through to each shareholder).

Let’s look at a few situations where you’d probably want to stay away from an S corporation.

As mentioned before, S corporations are pass-through entities, so the income is reported on each individual shareholder’s personal income tax return. Depending on the marginal tax rate, sometimes the tax can be cheaper when using the corporate tax rates than the individual. So it would make more sense to be organized as a regular corporation and have the corporation pay the tax.

Another situation is with fringe benefits. Fringe benefits of closely-held companies are normally taxable to an S corporation’s shareholder-employees. Again, another situation where you’d probably want to be a regular corporation.

Another reason you may want to stay away from S corporations is if you are looking for investors. Investors prefer regular corporations because S corporations aren’t allowed to have more than 100 shareholders, and they are limited to one class of stock, which means… no preferred stock.

Now, this obviously isn’t all inclusive. The point is, don’t just go out and form an S Corporation (or any entity for that matter) because someone told you to. The important thing to do before you create your entity is have some kind of understanding of the direction your company will likely head in and what’s important to you (investors, flexibility, lower income tax, etc.) and chose an entity based on that. And for goodness sake go talk to a decent tax accountant. Who probably isn’t your neighbor.

{ 0 comments }

Finders Keepers

Let’s say you had a certain amount of money deposited into your bank account unexpectedly… what would you do? What would you really do? What if the amount was only $50? What if it was $110,000? What if the amount was deposited by the IRS (or the Treasury)?

Would you try to figure out why it was deposited into your account? Or whether the funds actually belonged to you?

Or would you say nothing and just hope no one would notice there was a mistake made?

Or would you go out and spend it on your student loans, car payment, and foreclosure debt?

If you asked Stephen McDow, he probably would have answer yes to that last one.

You see where I’m going with this, right? McDow had $110,000 deposited into his account. He wasn’t expecting the money, and I’m willing to bet that not so deep down he knew that the money didn’t belong to him. Turns out that the money that was deposited into Mr. McDow’s account was actually a refund belonging to another taxpayer. Apparently, that taxpayer provided her accountant with information for a Citibank account that was closed in 2004. Citibank later reissued that account number to Mr. McDow.

After obtaining an e-mail address for McDow, the taxpayer had her attorney send him an e-mail with instructions to return the money. To which he responded that he’s already spent some of it—on student loans, a car loan, and a home loan, to be specific.

Mr. McDow apparently offered to make monthly payments, but let’s just say that that offer wasn’t accepted since the rightful owner reported the theft to the police.

McDow has since been arrested.

Who knows what was going through his head, but I just find it hard to fathom that someone can have that much money deposited in their account and not try to ensure that it really did belong to them. It’s one thing if you’re expecting it, but quite another to have that money mysteriously appear in your bank account one day.

Also, I guess I also don’t understand how someone who is expecting such a significant refund doesn’t bother to verify that the account number is correct before giving it to her accountant. The account was closed in 2004. I get that nowadays we rarely use checks and payments are withdrawn from your account automatically, but it was closed in 2004. 2004.

Apparently finders aren’t keepers.

{ 0 comments }

I’m Back!

The last tax season was, well, hectic.

After that I needed a vacation.

After my vacation I needed motivation to get back to writing. And to work in general.

Now, I’m back. Refresh and renewed.

The 2010 tax season was probably my most hectic. That’s not a complaint, though. Believe me. It proved to be really difficult to keep up with blogging and answering questions while I had returns and engagements to deal with.

And after tax season was finished, I had even more work to do. After that was done, I finally took a much-needed vacation. We went to visit family in Italy for what had to be the shortest two weeks ever. As I said, I’m back now, refreshed, and ready. Vacation will do that do you (after you get over the jet-lag, of course).

I’m gotten quite a few e-mails with questions, and quite frankly I am a bit surprised by the amount of e-mail I’ve received. I’ve tried my best to respond to as many as I could, but I haven’t posted any of those questions here. If you’ve sent me an e-mail and I haven’t responded, my apologies. I’m working my way through my inbox… and will hopefully get to yours eventually. Please keep in mind that I could just be waiting for a more appropriate time to respond to your inquiry.

{ 0 comments }

You want to know how I knew for sure today was March 15? No, I didn’t check my calendar. I checked my e-mail, and there they were: e-mails asking when corporate tax returns are due. Now, I occasionally get e-mails about due dates all throughout tax season, but for some reason, on March 15, I get more e-mails than I do any other day.

Apparently people are confused.  And I think most of the confusion has to do with the fact that individual tax returns aren’t actually due until April 15 (this year they are due April 18). Because of this, quite a few people, especially those that haven’t filed a corporate tax return before,  assume that the corporate tax return due date is also April 15. 

Corporate tax returns are in fact due March 15. (that’s today!)
So if you haven’t filed your corporate tax return as yet, either finalize the filing or do yourself a favor and file an extension using Form 7004, please.

While we’re on the subject of extensions, plthis would be a good time to point out that an extension is only an extension of time to file, not an extension of time to pay. So, if your return is on extension, and you end up with a balance due when you file the actual return, you may not be assessed a failure-to-file penalty, but you will get hit with the failure-to-pay penalty, which is currently .5%. Oh, and let’s not forget about interest.

So, what are you waiting for? Go file that return—or extension!

{ 0 comments }

Barbara asks:

My 16-year-old son earned $1,250.00 in modeling income this year. He was issued a 1099-MISC and his income was reported in Box 7. Does he have to report this income and pay a self employment tax?

Initially when I first started reading your e-mail, I thought it was going to be a kiddie tax issue. Thank Goodness it’s not. To answer your question, in one word, yes.

For dependents — and at 16, I imagine he’s still someone’s dependent — a return is usually not required unless any of the below apply:

  • Unearned income (think dividends, interest, etc.) was over $950.
  • Earned income was over $5,700
  • Gross Income exceeded the larger of $950 or earned income (not to more than $5,400) plus $300

And since the income your son received is considered earned income, and it wasn’t more than $5,700, on that front he’s fine.

Now, even if the above criteria aren’t met, as long as your son earned more than $400 of self-employed income, then he’s required to file a return and report self-employment tax.

Self-employment taxes are simply the employer and the employee portion of social security and medicare taxes. Both of which would have been deducted from wages if you receive a paycheck. Your employee would then match these taxes (except for in 2010).

Quick note: When I originally published this post, I neglected to mention the implications of self-employment tax.

Disclaimer: like any decent tax professional will tell you, since you’re not currently a client of mine—though you can be—it’s almost impossible to provide complete and accurate tax advice over the internet without being aware of the taxpayer’s entire situation; therefore, I suggest you consult your tax professional before relying solely on any information provided on this site.

{ 0 comments }

Taxpayer says:

Hello and thank you for your helpful website! I have been unable to find an answer to this question and I hope you can help.

I live in California and work part-time for a small business that is a corporation. I will be moving to Texas and my current employer and I have agreed that I would begin working for myself as an accountant. I will get a business license and be working for the same company as a bookkeeper. I will set my own schedule and help with payroll taxes and basic accounting for the company.

My question is this: Will there be any difficulty in my being a W-2 employee and 1099 Independent Contractor in the same year? For my employer or myself?
Also what forms should I fill out to make sure everything is legal and kosher?

I have researched this subject on irs.gov and I will qualify as a Independent Contractor as far as I can tell. Being the one who dictates how, when and why I do things for the company and no longer an hourly employee answering the phones and setting appointments. Also I may expand in the future to other small business (in Texas most likely) that will allow me the same freedom to work online from home as an accountant or bookkeeper.

First, congratulations are in order. Making the move from employee to self-employed is quite an accomplishment.

It seems like you’ve obviously done your homework on the independent contractor classification. Nowadays, the IRS will tend to look at the level of control you have regarding the work being performed. There are 20 factors that the IRS will consider when determining who qualifies as an independent contractor—from things such as whether you set your own hours, perform the work on your clients’ premises, work for more than one person, etc. The full list with a bit of guidance can be found here.

It sounds like you should be fine, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with you going from an employee to an independent contractor in the same year. I know of a few instances where employees have gone from being employees, to freelancing on the side, to being full-time self employed—all in the same year. In a couple of those situations, their employer ends up being one of their clients.

As for the what you should do, definitely apply for an EIN, if you haven’t already done so—it’s fast, and you’ll have the number in minutes. It also wouldn’t hurt to have some kind of contract or written agreement, such as an engagement letter. Also, give them a signed copy of a W9.

Good luck and enjoy being an entrepreneur!

Disclaimer: like any decent tax professional will tell you, since you’re not currently a client of mine—though you can be—it’s almost impossible to provide complete and accurate tax advice over the internet without being aware of the taxpayer’s entire situation; therefore, I suggest you consult your tax professional before relying solely on any information provided on this site.

{ 0 comments }